Center for International Environmental Legislation

What is Solar Radiation Modification?

Photo voltaic Radiation Modification (SRM) describes long term speculative geoengineering methods developed to partly block the solar, and mask the heating effect of greenhouse gasses. 

SRM does very little to deal with the root triggers of local weather transform, is inherently unpredictable and challenges further destabilizing an by now destabilized procedure with much more and new extremes. It would introduce a full host of new environmental and social dangers that are very likely to impact people already struggling the worst impacts of local climate modify the hardest.  

The Dangers of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection

Extensively talked about SRM techniques this sort of as Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) carry the even more hazard of ‘termination shock’ where injections of substances into the stratosphere would will need to be continued for decades if not hundreds of several years to stay clear of the risk of a sudden spiraling of international temperatures on cessation. All SRM strategies have the really actual risk of ‘moral hazard’ wherever relying on foreseeable future speculative technologies delays real local weather motion in the near phrase. 

Human Rights Fears and Opposition

The United Nations Human Rights Council’s Advisory Committee has warned that geoengineering technologies “could severely interfere with the pleasure of human rights for hundreds of thousands and potentially billions of people”. It also pointed out the disproportionate affect on Indigenous Peoples, peasants, fisherfolk, and some others living in rural spots. These exact same groups have been vocal in rejecting geoengineering as a dangerous distraction and untrue resolution that would violate their legal rights.

Governance Challenges and Unilateral Deployment Risks

By their incredibly mother nature, SRM systems can not be tested efficiently for their effects on the global climate other than through deployment. Simply because of the time body and complexity they desire there is no precedent in human historical past to give consolation that deployment of these technologies could ever be properly governed. The hazard of unilateral deployment and weaponization is actual. 

International Response


Together with other forms of geoengineering, SRM has been less than a de facto moratorium by way of the Conference on Biological Diversity considering that 2010, and maritime geoengineering tactics, which incorporate photo voltaic radiation modification and carbon removal strategies, are the topic of a drive for enhanced regulation less than the London Conference / London Protocol, which is the place the first geoengineering ban – on ocean fertilization – arose. 

World Management and the Get in touch with for Non-Use

Some non-public and point out actors are actively looking into and advertising and marketing solar geoengineering, and some outdoor experiments are heading ahead, regardless of worldwide limits, and sometimes without the need of the consent or even knowledge of Indigenous Peoples, communities and governments on whose land and territories they are done. 

States ought to accept the challenges posed by these most dystopian technologies by stepping up and committing to Non-Use of Photo voltaic Geoengineering. The 2023 final decision of the African Ministerial Meeting on the Surroundings contacting for a world SRM Non-Use governance mechanism reveals crucial leadership as does the European Parliament’s express 2023 contact for a non-use arrangement at worldwide level.

CIEL backs the contact of hundreds of top scientists from multi-disciplinary backgrounds and civil culture movements close to the globe for states to commit to Non-Use of Solar Radiation Modification. 

Uncover out much more and guidance the Solar Geoengineering Non Use Agreement right here

February 2024 Developments at the Sixth United Nations Surroundings Assembly, UNEA6

CIEL is concerned that the proposal in the resolution put forward to UNEA6 by Switzerland, Monaco, Guinea, and co-sponsored by Ga and Israel to create an Specialist Scientific Group could inadvertently undermine decisions of the CBD and London Convention / London Protocol (LC/LP), and pitfalls legitimizing SRM technology, and give address to big polluters to delay phasing out of fossil fuels.

In depth function has previously been carried out by specialists from varied scientific backgrounds to tell UN decisions to date, and the character of all those conclusions and their scientific conclusions have led to a de facto moratorium.

States at UNEA6 must reject the plan of an Expert Scientific Group and alternatively aim on recalling and strengthening current selections less than the CBD and LC/LP, upholding the precautionary theory, and rights of No cost Prior Knowledgeable Consent, entry to information, community participation, and access to justice and treatment, and complying with long-standing norms of intercontinental environmental law on transboundary environmental hurt.

States should really admit the threats posed by these most dystopian systems by stepping up and committing to Non-Use of Photo voltaic Geoengineering. The 2023 determination of the African Ministerial Conference on the Natural environment contacting for a world wide SRM Non-Use governance system shows critical management as does the European Parliament’s explicit 2023 simply call for a non-use agreement at global degree.


Supplemental sources:

Sherri Crump

Next Post

Dr Saoirse Enright appointed to diversity in legislation fellowship

Mon Feb 26 , 2024
Pictured (left–right): Nicola White, Dr Saoirse Enright, Michael Jackson, Dr Sara Benedi Lahuerta and Professor Laurent Pech. Dr Saoirse Enright has been appointed as the Matheson Diversity in Legislation Newman Fellow at UCD Sutherland College of Regulation. Dr Enright will be a part of the legislation university to supply a […]

You May Like