NPR’s Sarah McCammon talks to professor Scott Cumming of UCLA College of Law, about John Eastman asking a judge to postpone his disbarment proceedings in case he is indicted with the former president.
SARAH MCCAMMON, HOST:
Lawyer John Eastman is inquiring for the postponement of a disciplinary proceeding that could conclude with his disbarment. Eastman is a previous law professor and legal professional close to former President Donald Trump. The California Condition Bar states he prepared, promoted and assisted Trump in making an attempt to overturn the authentic success of the 2020 election. In all, Eastman faces 11 rates, most related to generating fake statements and misrepresentations, among the them statements at a January 6 rally that the condition bar says helped provoke the mob that attacked the Capitol.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
JOHN EASTMAN: All we are demanding a Vice President Pence is this afternoon at 1:00, he let the legislatures of the condition look into this so we get to the bottom of it, and the American persons know no matter if we have command of the path of our government or not.
MCCAMMON: Becoming a member of us now is Scott Cummings. He’s a scholar and professor of authorized ethics at the UCLA Faculty of Regulation. Thanks so much for your time, Professor Cummings.
SCOTT CUMMINGS: Thanks for obtaining me.
MCCAMMON: First of all, what does it imply for an attorney to be disbarred, and why might it come about?
CUMMINGS: Disbarment is the best sanction. It claims that a lawyer’s completely denied the privilege of training regulation, symbolizing clients, whole cease. And this occurs for the most extreme perform.
MCCAMMON: And that’s what John Eastman is going through. His lawyers say if the proceedings – the disbarment proceedings – are not delayed, that could make a conflict with his Fifth Amendment legal rights from self-incrimination. What does that indicate in this context, and what could it advise in phrases of the lawful jeopardy he’s going through?
CUMMINGS: Very well, I imagine the concern is that he’s extensively reputed to be co-conspirator amount two in the federal indictment that was issued by Jack Smith. And so I imagine his issue is that if he will make statements in the bar proceedings, they may possibly be utilised as proof towards him in the event that Jack Smith decides to finally indict John Eastman. I imagine you will find a good deal of speculation suitable now that Smith has type of crafted the indictment to singularly focused on Trump but that he could possibly subsequently determine to go after the co-conspirators. John Eastman could be in legal jeopardy in that regard.
MCCAMMON: Eastman is not alone in Trump’s legal circle in struggling with disciplinary actions relevant to efforts to overturn the election. Main among them, New York and D.C. have previously suspended Rudy Giuliani’s license to follow. What variety of evidence is needed to correctly willpower lawyers in these scenarios?
CUMMINGS: Effectively, the evidence which is needed will have to be supplied by very clear and convincing evidence. So it is really a very large typical. It can be fascinating, if you glimpse at the costs that have been levied towards Eastman in the California proceedings. But the bulk of the promises are truly about misrepresentation in the service of bad steps, what the California rules contact ethical turpitude. And so the proof that the bar is putting out is that there are lies that have been employed to advance poor functions – bad acts like advancing a wrong principle of how to overturn the election, pressuring Pence to do this, building statements at the Ellipse on January 6 that were designed to whip up the group.
MCCAMMON: Of course, a approach like disbarment has major implications for the lawyer himself or herself. But what function does it provide, say, in, you know, preserving the integrity of the legal program?
CUMMINGS: So portion of willpower is about getting out negative actors and signaling what the lawful career stands for. And in this certain situation, I consider the penalties of not disbarring John Eastman, if, in fact, the evidence stands up in the bar proceedings, are massive, simply because if an individual can merely get out of difficulty, in essence simply because of their purported own perception in a different established of details, then the regulatory purpose, I assume, is is in good peril.
MCCAMMON: Scott Cummings is a professor of authorized ethics at the UCLA University of Legislation. Many thanks so a great deal for your time.
CUMMINGS: Thank you for obtaining me.
(SOUNDBITE OF Music)
NPR transcripts are established on a hurry deadline by an NPR contractor. This textual content may possibly not be in its final type and may possibly be up to date or revised in the long run. Precision and availability might change. The authoritative file of NPR’s programming is the audio report.